I am amused, though fed up with this whole thing. I have nothing to add that hasn't been said, no added facts at least. Peo's writings continue, in the same manner as before, without any basis in fact, nor really being relevant. I admit my/ this blog is not really relevant either, it is just an outlet for all the emotions I have regarding what happened- but then again you (whoever you are) are reading it. So right now, all I am doing is voicing an opinion:

Peo's writings, apart from relevance and fact base, aren't very coherent, nor mature. He doesn't address any issue, nor state any events that has/have anything to do with his actions. He still has not told a story (because his lies are different to everbody), he is still just going on about my state of mind (insane;), my actions (terrible;), and the authorities he has contacted (of which there is no proof). He waffles/rambles on, might as well be writing about widgets- for all the sense and truth there is. He tries to turn "everything" against me, fitting part truths and total fabrications together, trying to be credible- though, to any logical person, it must be clear that there is no rationale in his text. No matter what he says of me, there is still nothing that  purports him to be innocent, nor anything to explain his actions, nor even tries to explain my actions. And I should truly like to hear his explanation for all the proof, and all the witnesses.
People can think what they want of me, I couldn't care less-but no matter what Peo's says/ writes about me, these same people will be cautious around him.

And as to Fabiola. If she had been a decent person, she would have asked to confirm (just to be sure) the proof regarding financial transactions; and then made sure I got my money back, or at least all the money that she and the children had been living on (Peo might have used some of it for other things). Who knows, either imbecile or criminal... but as her actions have shown, definitely not decent.

As you may notice, I don't even comment on Peo as person, the story in itself shows who/ what he is/ isn't. 

 









 
Summary 11/26/2008
 

Per-Otto/ Peo lied, conned and outright stole. I was gullible, believing, caring- stupid but with my heart  (and faith in humanity) in the right place. His wife.. well, he obviously didn´t need to be home nor faithful, nor even married- she is either a complete imbecile or an accessory. 

I have done everything I can to let people at risk know. Whatever happens, the chance/ risk of this happening again is significantly lower- unless of course they change their names. I feel sorry for the children, I truly do- growing up in a home with one (or more) evil parent (s) will cause damage (personal experience).

I am surviving, will survive, have survived. I will never forget, nor forgive, though. What I experienced at the hands of Peo is not forgivable- abusing love, trust, faith... is never acceptable, especially when a young child is involved. The more cruel, the less forgivable. Peo was cruel to me and my son- directly and indirectly. Psychopath, sociopath, compulsive liar, lacking empathy/ sympathy.... a determination of psychological disorder(s) would make me happy (in the sense that it would help me understand, get closure).

I have proof and witnesses in abundance- from the last two years. I have all rights on my side.

And, I just wonder, why was nobody around him willing/ capable of telling the truth? If I had known, I could have had my life back! Man blir som man umgås.. oempatisk (minst), omänsklig (medel), ...... (Peo).

In regards to Peo's comment on this category: jajajajaja/ yayayaya.... Let's see who actually has a thing with the Swedish judicial system- I have proof of that, as well as all else I write.  And if regarding me (though nothing on checkable record in Sweden, "country of public records") there should be something;) .. I will deal with it, take the consequences, maximise the publicity- because nothing will make me back down from telling the truth.  I have done nothing wrong, morally or principally, but if legally.... take me to court, try to get me fined or put in jail; because I will continue to make sure that the truth is not hidden, I will not let Peo try to intimidate me into silence, NEVER.


If Peo has a problem with the situation, i.e. website, he can easily fix that by paying back the money,and giving back my property. If he did that, I could only accuse him of being liar, not a thief/ criminal.




 
 

I am getting my equilibrium/ my mojo/ joie de vivre back. Peo did his best to take my sanity, but only managed to get my time and money- my sanity he took periodically (and only for/through concern for his health).

He is evil. I am okay (probably better than most). I can live with myself, every second of every day. One consolation is that he has to live with himself. I am also consoled by the fact that he will not be able to pull this kind of stunt again, not without  (Google using) people, at the least , cautious/ careful.

Judicially, I am relying on the Swedish system- i.e. not really helpful in Mexico. So I'll have to believe believe in karma, justice etc... Peo(ple) getting what (t)he(y) deserve(s). Resuming my/ a proper life is more important than anything. I have wasted enough: energy, time, money.  I've done what I can to let people know the truth, hopefully nobody will ever again have to suffer at the hands of Peo.



What I really want back? Time and money, obviously;)

Mainly, my : grandfathers wedding band, puzzle ring, digital photo frame, modern oil painting (butterfly), telephone (now out of date)- some things claimed to have been stolen during robberies, some to be held in Mexico until we had found a house to live in.

And, though on principle I am against wanting presents back, an heirloom Arosenius painting. He just doesn't deserve to have it.



And, just FYI, 700 unique vistors to lekare.net. 700 people who can not be conned in the future. I am smiling:)!


 









 
 

I have raised the question of whether she was actively involved.

She has been supported on stolen money for the last year. She has known about me and let her husband continue his deception.  Those are facts.

Whatever her part in this, through her husband she is, by association, a risk to people around her. People need to be warned.

If she is not involved, I apologise for her discomfort- but I can not be held responsible for creating the situation. If she is not involved she can tell me herself, preferably repaying money/ getting her husband to. I am willing to retract and apologise if she can prove that she was not involved, explain the situation of the last (preferably two) year(s).

As to the children... If anybody causes them harm, it would be adults in their surroundings who would let the sins of parents be taken out on kids. I warned the school of the risk, because if I were in the situation of not knowing I would want to- i.e. if I were at the risk of con artists. If Peo had not done what he did, there would be nothing to tell. I have not lied, nor hurt anyone- I have told the truth, if the truth hurts... that has not nothing to do with me.







 
Important? 11/05/2008
 

Nowhere does Per-Otto Lekare tell a complete version of events.

I would really like to know his story. So would a lot of other people- and not on request only. If he had a credible story, that didn't differ when told to people... it would be out there for all to see. He has his website, he comments on mine; has an opinion about everything and everybody, seemingly enjoying to focus on my personality traits, my actions (whether true or not)- but nowhere does he explain how he ended up in the current situation. 


As previously stated, this is not about the relationship not working out. This is abut the fact that he lied, conned, duped, stole, abused under a long period of time. Had he actually been ill, in hospital, I could live with the loss of the money (I cared enough about his health to want to help). But he lied about being sick, he lied about being robbed of heirloom jewelry, he actually stole money outright, he lied about everything- not acceptable.

Relationships end, which is not the end of the world- Peo and I did not have a relationship: he had a con, I had hope.





 
 

I talked to Peo yesterday- I called. I figured if he can email me, I can call. I don't know what I was thinking. The conversation was civil (in comparison to our "cyberwar") but a sham- I asked for explanations, he told me a story that seemed prepared/ rehearsed (in case the converstion was being recorded?)- there was no truth (which I should have known considering everything). The reason I am writing about this, well, the conversation, in retrospect, was quite amusing. The amusing part was that he stuck to the story he had been telling me all along- continued to claim that he was undergoing medical treatment during the specified period. The amusing thing about this is the story is disproven by physical evidence. I have physical, documented, unbiased proof- and since he can not comprehend that/ how I got it, he continues lying. He thinks his plan, his actions, his intelligence all were infallible. I.e. what I find amusing is that he believes himself so superior that he will stick to a disproven fact because he can not understand that he made a mistake. Another amusing part: Peo claims that all the money was a loan but since I have behaved badly he is under no obligation to pay it back! More amusement: neither of us believes the other regarding the matter being reported to the police. Funnily enough I called the police, who couldn't find any kind of report- when I tried to reach Peo again to inform him of this, obviously he refused to answer.

Apart from the amusement... the conversation was upsetting. Because despite all that I know, I still have problems coming to terms with it. Having your trust, faith totally shattered by someone that you have believed in, loved, dedicated yourself to is always difficult. But realizing that everything you have believed in is a lie, is totally crushing. Yesterday I was reminded of that, the incredible pain came back and I was reduced to tears. It hurts, being betrayed, duped.

I am not upset because the relationship didn't work out. I am upset because I was lied to for so long, that I was conned and stolen from. If Peo had actually been ill, actually been in hospital, actuallly been robbed....... I could have accepted not getting the money back; obviously been sad, hurt, but just moved on with my life. Lying, duping, conning, stealing, decieving, abusing- those are all unacceptable things.



 
Children 11/04/2008
 

 Got a warning today "that I'd gone too far, that I'd made a bad move, oops...oops...oops".

This is in reference to that I informed the school which Peo's children attend. I believe that the administration and other parents have a right to know what kind of people they are dealing with. I would want to know if I were in any kind of danger from people around me, whatever the social context.

I should like to point out that Peo involved my son, lied to him, led him on, led him to believe a great many things under a long period of time. He obviously has no compunction about hurting a child.

If his children are hurt by the truth, then that is not my fault. 1) He shouldn't have done what he did, then the facts couldn't have come out. 2) I have not informed his children. If his children are affected it is because of parents who will let children suffer for the sins of the parents.







 
 

"In addition, there has been numerous attempts by this person to inflict harm on Fabiola Kun. Phone harrassment and threats to me and my family have been delivered".

This is taken directly from Peo's website. Ludicrous, even more ludicirous than the rest of it. He can write whatever he feels like- it won't make it the least bit true.

I want to meet him in court, not process against a defendant who is "hiding"on the other side of the world. I have witnesses and proof of all I say, he has whatever he has fabricated. I have told as many people I can, people who are connected to him, should be aware of the truth. It is my duty as a human being to spread the truth/ to make it as difficult as possible for Peo to ever do this again.

In response to Peo comments:

Fabiola: has been sustained on my money for the last year (unless it was spent on other things), she knew about me and ignored all facts. I have never claimed that she is proven guilty, only that she has known most facts, and that she by association to Peo is a liability to all people she comes into contact with.

Attack on a third person: yes, countering with infomation that is of no consequence to this matter at all, spreading that the person in question beats people... very relevant.

Theft: Taking money without the owners knowledge? Obtaining money by lying, then not paying it back? Borrowing a mobile phone then claiming to be robbed of it? Claiming to be robbed of heirloom jewelry?

Police report: none registered as of today. Feel free to call the police and check.










 
Credibility 11/02/2008
 

Apart from the truth/ entire story (including the existing amount of witnesses and proof) there are a couple of factors that affect Peo's current credibility.

1- That his "truth" can only be obtained by emailing him..... i.e. a personal answer that is adapted to whoever is asking. Giving different stories to different people according to what they might know, believe, have heard.... Why is there not one truth, that all can read?

2- Why the neccessity to register to comment on his website? Pick and choose- the ones who are favourable? I have not erased any comments and welcome all people with an opinion (as long as it is expressed in a civilized manner, i.e. no swearing, rude comments).

3- Why was his website closed for the better part of a year? Claiming in December 2007 that he'd been away, still was... Couldn't risk me reading his blog and realizing that all was not as he claimed?