Two months of knowing the truth. Still having problems coming to terms with it. What I need to to do is accept that there exists true evil ..... Yeah, well.... I know life is totally unfair, that people are cruel. I just have real problems accepting that people can be SO cruel- prolonged, unneccessarily, without any empathy or sympathy at all. I may have proof, tons of it, from many people; I just don't want to accept it. I believe in the goodness of people,I don't want to give up on people, life, lose hope.

 

10/22/2008 06:48:44 am

If anyone is interested in the truth, please check:
www.lekare.se (Swedish)
www.lekare.info (English)
www.lekare.com.mx (Spanish)

I suppose this comment will not be published, since this person is NOT interested in letting anyone know anything that might be true about her.

Reply
10/22/2008 06:53:24 am

www.lekare.info
www.lekare.org
www.lekare.mobi
www.lekare.se
www.lekare.com.mx
www.lekare.com

Reply
10/22/2008 06:55:12 am

www.lekare.com, that's all I need to say

Reply
10/22/2008 06:56:16 am

Erasing comments doesn't erase the truth
www.lekare.info
www.lekare.com.mx
www.lekare.se

Reply
Anita Lekare
10/22/2008 07:12:17 am

If anyone asks you to erase their name from your website, you have to oblige with that request - according to Swedish and International Law. So here I please ask you to remove my name from this webpage.

Reply
Anita Lekare
10/23/2008 05:15:05 am

You didn't have the courage to delete my name? What about Fabiola's name? She has never done anything about you. Not even said a bad word about you. You are truly the person my brother told me about.

Reply
Kim Dahlin
10/23/2008 06:49:46 pm

Jag förstår att du har svårt att tro på det Andrea säger om din bror, det känns för osannolikt att någon kan bete sig så vedervärdigt. Och kanske speciellt någon som man älskar. Det var nog så Andrea kände också. Jag är ledsen att behöva säga det, men du måste nog omvärdera din bror. Det är inte bara Andrea som känner till sanningen om honom. Vi är många. Jag har själv sett hans mejl, hans sms och stått bredvid när Andrea har pratat med honom i telefon. Jag har läst och hört hans beskrivningar av hur han legat inlagd på psykiatrisk klinik i över ett halvår, fått en stroke, haft hjärtproblem, inte träffat sin familj överhuvudtaget på över ett halvår, varit arbetslös och blivit rånad (4 gånger) med mera. Han har ju de facto skilt sig från sin fru i Sverige och varit skriven hos Andrea. Han har stulit avsevärda summor av henne. Du måste ju ändå fundera över varför Andrea skulle göra sig allt det här besväret? Varför tar du inte del av de bevis som finns? Det är illa nog att lura en vuxen människa som älskar och litar på en, men att lura ett litet barn (Alexander, 8 år) är under all mänsklig värdighet. Om han åtminstone hade haft ryggrad nog att stå för vad han gjort. Istället försvann Peo med svansen mellan benen och gjorde sig onåbar när kontokortskvittona kom. Skulle vara så intressant att höra vad mytomanen/psykopaten Peo säger om Andrea till dig och sin fru (och alla andra)?


Reply
Adi
10/23/2008 07:59:52 pm

People that know Andrea know that she speaks the truth! And Anita you basically admited with your comment that you did do something bad to Andrea.

Reply
Peo
10/24/2008 03:05:30 am

Whatever you are trying to accomplish, you should know that you are doing something illegal.. "evidence" or not. This is a tip. To thrash somebody else on the Internet is NOT permitted. It doesn't matter what kind of "evidence" you might have. It's simply illegal. And denounced to Swedish police authorities as well. Read the lawbook. Good night.

Reply
Adi
10/24/2008 05:21:15 am

Freedom of speech
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Freedom of speech is the freedom to speak freely without censorship or limitation. The synonymous term freedom of expression is sometimes used to denote not only freedom of verbal speech but any act of seeking, receiving and imparting information or ideas, regardless of the medium used. Freedom of speech and freedom of expression is closely related to, yet distinct from, the concept of freedom of thought or freedom of conscience. In practice, the right to freedom of speech is not absolute in any country and the right is commonly subject to limitations, such as on "hate speech" (see hate speech below). This is because exercising freedom of speech always takes place within a context of competing values.

The right to freedom of speech is recognized as a human right under Article 19 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and recognized in international human rights law in the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR). The ICCPR recognizes the right to freedom of speech as "the right to hold opinions without interference. Everyone shall have the right to freedom of expression".[1][2] Furthermore freedom of speech is recognized in European, inter-American and African regional human rights law.

Hate speech
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hate speech is a term for speech intended to degrade, intimidate, or incite violence or prejudicial action against a person or group of people based on their race, gender, age, ethnicity, nationality, religion, sexual orientation, gender identity, disability, language ability, ideology, social class, occupation, appearance (height, weight, hair color, etc.), mental capacity, and any other distinction that might be considered by some as a liability. The term covers written as well as oral communication and some forms of behaviors in a public setting. It is also sometimes called antilocution and is the first point on Allport's scale which measures prejudice in a society. Critics have claimed that the term "Hate Speech" is a modern example of Newspeak, used to silence critics of social policies that have been poorly implemented in a rush to appear politically correct[1][2][3].

[edit] Sweden
Sweden prohibits hate speech, hets mot folkgrupp, and defines it as publicly making statements that threaten or express disrespect for an ethnic group or similar group regarding their race, skin colour, national or ethnic origin, faith or sexual orientation.

Does not include you Peo!




Reply
Kim Dahlin
10/24/2008 07:00:40 am

I can understand that you find it difficult to believe what Andrea is saying about your brother, it feels too unlikely that somebody could act so terribly. And maybe especially someone you love. That was probably how Andrea felt too. I’m sorry to have to tell you, but you probably need to reconsider your brother. It is not only Andrea who knows the truth about him. We are many. I have personally seen his mails, his text messages, and have stood next to Andrea when she has spoken to him on the phone. I have read, and heard, his descriptions of how he has been in a psychiatric clinic, had a stroke, had heart problems, not seen his family at all for over six months, been unemployed, and been robbed (4 times) etc. He has, de facto, divorced his wife and been registered as living with Andrea. He has stolen considerable sums from her. You need to think about why Andrea would go through all this trouble? Why don’t you take part of the existing evidence? It is bad enough to dupe a grown up who loves and trusts you, but to dupe a small child (Alexander,8) is beneath all human dignity. If he at least had the backbone to stand for what he’s done. Instead Peo disappeared with his tail between his legs, as soon as the credit card bills came. Would be so interesting to hear what the pathological liar/psychopath Peo says about Andrea to you, and his wife (and everybody else)?

Reply
Kim Dahlin
10/24/2008 07:01:48 am

Is it legal to trash somebody IRL?

Reply



Leave a Reply.